Talk:Instauration

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Human rights

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

This magazine should have an entry in the encyclopedia because it was so unusual in many respects. It received comment in mainstream publications, and is discussed today as an example of hatred or intolerance. As more becomes known about this magazine, the information can be collected in the Wiki entry. I am not exactly sure how to round out the entry. I have some citations showing that it existed, and I have some citations illustrating how it and the editor were perceived. 404A4BC76978E (talk) 03:45, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. The irony of a writer as gifted as "Robertson" taking such odious positions is interesting in itself. (Nazi Germany had some good writers too, as well as one of the greatest filmmakers, Riefenstahl.) As a Jew I cannot abide his views, but to the extent that the "beat no one else dared to touch," the beat of racial differences, including intellectual, moral, etc. differences, is legitimate, he made a contribution. 67.173.10.34 (talk) 08:48, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Larry Siegel[reply]