Talk:Intecymbium

Spiders Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spiders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spiders on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpidersWikipedia:WikiProject SpidersTemplate:WikiProject SpidersSpiders articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

South America: Argentina / Chile Low‑importance

	Latin America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Argentina (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chile (assessed as Low-importance).

Merge with Intecymbium antarcticum?[edit]

Hi,

This page is available in more languages but are not linked as it is referred to as Intecymbium antarcticum (the species, but the only species in this genus). How best to merge the two?

Cheers, Uninspired Username (talk) 23:46, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Uninspired Username: this is a perennial problem caused by Wikidata refusing to accept that articles in different language wikis are not in a 1:1 relationship to one another. In particular, different language wikis have different policies on monotypic genera; some have one article at the genus, some have one article at the species, some have an article each for the genus and species. There are two approaches you can take, neither ideal:

Look at all the language wikis and see what title is used by the majority of those who have one article. Move all the links to the one-article wikis to the Wikidata item with this majority title. The drawback is that it will look as if some language wikis have the wrong article linked.
Link each wiki article to the Wikidata item with the same title. The drawback is that some inter-wiki links won't show up.

What you should be able to do, but can't, because the Wikidata editors won't allow it, is to connect an article on a monotypic genus and its species to both the genus and species Wikidata items. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:55, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]