Talk:Irish Convention

Ireland High‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I don't think Long "intrigued" against Home Rule, as he was very open in his opposition to it.86.42.199.103 (talk) 12:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the point you make. I have replaced intrigued with conspired. It you have a better phrase then please propose it, or simply re-edit in the article. From what I have gathered, he was not just simply openly against Home Rule, but he also worked and pulled strings in the background to condsiderably undermine it. Osioni (talk) 16:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This whole article is written as a lament from the point of view of someone who regarded a very limited version of Home Rule as a full andfair settlement of the Irish question. As such it is an opinion piece and exhibits fatal levels of bias. 2405:4803:C81D:74D0:469B:B13:CABF:661A (talk) 17:47, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your special contribution. Yes, it is a record of events as they happened, a fatal path for the better.... History is as history was, regrettably, gladly or otherwise.Osioni (talk)

POV[edit]

While many might agree with some of the editorializing in this article, it is not encyclopedic and should be amended. Straw Cat (talk) 17:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been almost entirely stable since 2011. There might be the odd phrase here or there, probably unconscious, but I really don't see anything non-neutral in the general tone of the article. Tagging it gives a very false impression.Paulturtle (talk) 00:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]