Talk:Fender J5 Telecaster

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Guitarists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Guitarists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GuitaristsWikipedia:WikiProject GuitaristsTemplate:WikiProject Guitaristsguitarist articles
	This article is supported by Guitar equipment task force.

Musical Instruments Low‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is the phrase "hot" to do with personal opinion or with the name of the style? because if "hot" is personal opinion it must be removed. Steven Kovax 07:00, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hot is not personal opinion, it has to do with the level of output of the pickup (usually in millivolts). It should not be removed, since the term "hot" is valuable information about the guitar and its pickups. Hot pickups will overdrive a tube amp better than "non-hot" pickups. Realtimekid 17:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Fender J5 Telecaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporal

I've replaced the {{when}} tag on the list of models. As written, the topic doesn't explain when the various models were specifically made. "Throughout the years" is too weaselly and inspescific for an encyclopedia article. References should be provided t to describe the production runs of these variants. -- Mikeblas (talk) 02:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Endorsements

I've again reomved the list of "notable players" as this list is indiscriminate and unreferenced. Per WP:BLP, material about living people must be sourced. Commercial endorsements are something that should be referenced, even if it were possible to demonstrate that they were materially relevant to the topic of the article. -- Mikeblas (talk) 02:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]