Talk:John Taylor, Baron Taylor of Warwick
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
The Right Honourable
[edit]Taylor is a baron and therefore has the honorific of The Right Honourable. This not linked with be a member of the Privy Counsel which is indicated with the post-nom of "PC" in peers. So, "|honorific-prefix = The Right Honourable" is correct. It is not about consensus in the case, but correctness. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 19:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Pinging previous editors who have contested or implemented this change: @Interpuncts, Ironman1104, Quisquidillius, Kashmiri Munda, and Opera hat. Primefac (talk) 19:28, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for the ping. By virtue of being a baron in the peerage of the UK Taylor is entitled to the style 'The Right Honourable'. When writing to a peer that is not a member of the privy council, 'The Right Honourable' is simply truncated to 'The'. I think that this may be the source of contention. Equally, you would not write an invitation to 'His Grace the Duke of Devonshire'. You'd just say 'The Duke of Devonshire, [postnominals]'. (Debretts). I would leave the style in the infobox. It is part of his title but customary to leave out of correspondence. · | (talk - contributions) 14:28, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
The article's source dodspeople
[edit]www.dodspeople.com
Any reason to consider this WP:BLP-good? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:12, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Their "About" page doesn't even work... Primefac (talk) 13:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I saw that too. They do have this: [1] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Dods Parliamentary Companion. Seems legit. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Spouse
[edit]The current Lady Taylor is identified on His Lordship's own website and in several sources to which that page refers. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (peerage) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (peerage) articles
- Peerage and Baronetage work group articles
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- C-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- C-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles