Talk:Kaleb of Axum

Biography: Military / Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Ethiopia High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethiopia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ethiopia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EthiopiaWikipedia:WikiProject EthiopiaTemplate:WikiProject EthiopiaEthiopia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography assessment rating comment

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 13:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

First time I removed the stub note, it was because the template didn't exist; now the template does. However, I'm removing it this time because a stub template is a warning to the reader that the article is too short to provide a satistfactory overview of the subject. (One rule of thumb I use depends on how many paragraphs an article has: less than 3 multi-sentence paragraphs, it's clearly a stub.) I feel this opinion is in harmony with the guidelines at Wikipedia: Stub.

Just because an article is no longer a stub -- or even if it's achieved Featured Article status -- does not mean it wouldn't be a better article if more material were added. But at the moment, I'd say this article clearly is long enough to be generally useful, in a large part due to Yom's additions. -- llywrch 16:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC) kaleb roxs[reply]

Okay, that's fine. I thought that, generally, the more important/more an article could be written on, the longer an article could be and still be considered a stub. Just as a note, the royalty stub existed before; it was just mispelled in this article. Just a note, but check out the geography talk at WikiProject Ethiopia, some of the woredas don't show up on the map. — ዮም (Yom) | contribs • Talk 16:37, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

from the Greek Ελεσβόάς

Wouldn't one of those accents have to go?--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 13:08, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]