Talk:Kazuhiko Nishijima/GA1

Work in collaboration with Gell-Mann[edit]

Did Nishijima ever work directly with Murray Gell-Mann? If yes, why is there no common publication mentioned? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.60.154.66 (talk) 07:18, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 12:13, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)

Overview: This is a short article, which is not a problem in itself, but it confines itself to the subject's professional career. Where was he brought up, where was he schooled, he was 18 years old in 1946, did he serve in the armed forces? Did he ever marry, are ther children? Did he have interests outside the field of physics? Was he involved in any major scientific controversies? As it stands the article doesn't feel, just a dry summary of his achievements.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
The lead does not fully summarize the article and also conatins facts that are not in the article, please read WP:LEAD
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Ref #1 [1] is a dead link
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Feels incomplete
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
On hold for seven days whilst the issues above are addressed. Please comment here.

OK, it has been 11 days without any activity at all so I will fail this nomination at this time. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:27, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]