Talk:Kyi dynasty
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:09, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Unintelligible paragraph[edit]
The section "Khorezmian hypothesis of V. Toporov" contained a paragraph that I was unable to make any sense of, so I went ahead and deleted it. If anyone can explain what it means (and, preferably, rephrase it so as to make it make sense, and provide additional sources), feel free to restore it. The wording of said section was:
This author is not the author of the statement, and the fact is that he propounded the hypothesis by entering into confusion with explicit epigraphic materials (see Kuar, Meltei and Chorean "History of Taron"). Respect for those who would be suitable, for absolutely overwhelming archaeological memorials exist and were repeated several times. I sing the supernaturalness of writings and the fact that Oleg Vischy, having buried himself Kyiv (from the writings), was not a town which will be named after the Khorezm chiller. Navi, the warriors of the Varangians in Kyiv (earlier than 930 years), for the purpose of the person of the father Aḥmadu 'bnu Kūyah, of all the times of the age of Kyiv Toporova, information Al Masudi zamalo, tim mor. Hypothesis was involved as a pretext about the emergence of a Khorezmian vіyska among the khozars close to the 9th and 10th centuries.
I would have written it off as sheer vandalism, had it not been for the fact that it has appeared in the article ever since it was created by translation of the corresponding article in Ukrainian. Nikolaj1905 (talk) 08:17, 8 January 2024 (UTC)