Talk:Leslie V. Woodcock

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Censorship[edit]

Why have Woodcock's views on global warming been censored? [1] Biscuittin (talk) 12:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The reason stems from an editing war that excluded him from the global warming critique list article. As part of that battle, those wanting to exclude as many scientists from the list as possible tried to delete Woodcock's article, since a criterion to be on the list is for the scientist to have his own Wikipedia article. When that did not work, they argued that Woodcock's views expressed to the published media are so absurd as to be defamatory towards Woodcock himself, and that on that basis these views should be censored from both articles. Such is the nature of that editing war. I am against the said censorship. Denis.g.rancourt (talk) 14:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Leslie V. Woodcock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]