Talk:Matthaeus Platearius

Major error

The authority in note 1 for the proposition that MP wrote "Circa Instans", in fact says that MP did not write C I. "But thirty years ago new light was thrown on its origin by an Italian authority, Professor Giulio Camus, who found in the Biblioteca Estense at Modena two manuscripts belonging to the fifteenth century. One of these, in Latin, is a treatise on simple medicines, of which the other, in French, is a translation. According to Professor Camus, the Latin manuscript is the work which went through many printed editions, and was popularly known as the " Circa Instans," from the first words of its introduction, which begins, " Circa instans negotium de simplicibus medicinis nostrum versatur propositum," &c. This has long been attributed by medical historians to Matthoeus Platearius, a physician of Salerno in the twelfth century. The " Explicit " of this Latin manuscript is reproduced in facsimile in Professor Camus's memoir, " L'Opera Saleritana ' Circa Instans ' ed il testo primitivo del ' Grand Herbier in Francoys,' secondo duo codici del secolo XV, conservati nella Regia Biblioteca Estense." It runs: "Explicit tractatus herbarum Dioscoridis et Platonis atque Galieno et Macrone translatate, manu et intellectu Bartholomami minid' senis in arte speciarie semper infusus." Some French verses are also reproduced. In these we read, "Il a este escript Millcccc cinquante et huit." It appears, therefore, that the work " Circa Instans " was not written in the twelfth century by the Salernitan physician, Matthaeus Platearius, but by one " Bartholomaeus minid' senis" (? de Senis) in the year 1458. As Professor Camus's memoir was published in 1886, it is somewhat strange that no reference to it is to be found in the recent " Geschichte der Medizin" of Neuberger and Pagel, where the " Circa Instans " is still referred to as the work of Platearius. From this one may infer that the memoir is not well known-an inference. supported by the fact that it lies hidden away in the " Memorie della Reglia Accademia di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti in Modena," ser. 2, vol. iv, 1886, p. 49. It is worthy of a separate existence." (Old English Herbals, 1525-1640 - H. M. Barlow, pp.126-7)

Northutsire (talk) 20:38, 7 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Northutsire (talk • contribs) 20:33, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Matthaeus Platearius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20120907172025/http://www.ibidispress.scriptmania.com/custom2.html to http://www.ibidispress.scriptmania.com/custom2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 22 January 2018 (UTC)