Talk:Maverick (roller coaster)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 23:46, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    See comment section below. Good.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    See comment section below. Good.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 19:28, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

  • "On the week of August 12, 2006, the first track segments were installed", ref 9 doesn't support this.
    • I fixed it, it was supposed to say August 16.--Astros4477 (talk) 20:37, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Track installion was completed around October 26, 2006", might be worth looking on the internet for a more precise date.
  • "On May 17, 2007, the heartline roll was removed and was replaced with an s-curve five days later", ref 13 doesn't say that the s-curve was placed five days later.
  • Can you please fix the youtube links that lead to the mobile site.
  • "Brett - Brass, Brent - Gold, Ben - Gunmetal, Beau - Gold, Bart - Silver, and Sam - Copper", ref 3 only supports the colours, not the names.
  • "The passenger height restriction was initially set to a minimum of 48 inches (120 cm). In May 2007, the height restriction was raised to a minimum of 52 inches (130 cm) per recommendations made by Intamin", ref 15 doesn't mention the original 48 inch height requirement.

These are the things that need to be fixed. The quality of the article (as in the way it is written) is very good. The article will be on hold for 7 days.--Dom497 (talk) 20:26, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed everything.--Astros4477 (talk) 21:01, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have passed the article.--Dom497 (talk) 19:28, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]