Talk:Michelle Yesudas

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Malaysia Low‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

This page was proposed for deletion by 113.210.107.49 (talk · contribs) on 4 April 2017 with the comment:
Posted as a resumé booster
It was contested by 104.163.140.228 (talk · contribs) on 5 April 2017 with the comment:
if the PROD applier actually read the article, they would see six decent sources in the reflist.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Wikipedia worthy[edit]

Not sure if she qualifies for Wikipedia. The claim is founder of (or one of) Lawyers of Liberty but is not mentioned in that entry.--AhmedFaizP (talk) 23:14, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unrelated links/refs[edit]

@Atlantic306: I notice you've been reverting a number of links back in; but at the moment, it looks like the IP address is correct, and those are relevant, which is why I declined your protection request. Why do you keep replacing these? Vanamonde (talk) 05:18, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the ip is also adding that the subject is a satanist instead of a christian, will discuss moving links to talkpage , when possible, thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atlantic306 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Um. Missed that, somehow: but a blanket revert was still not appropriate. You should have reverted the category, and reported the IP for disruptive editing to AIV. Still: @BU Rob13: I don't know if you saw this either, but it seems like you were right and I was wrong. I'm wondering now if some BLP revdels are appropriate. Vanamonde (talk) 17:29, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanamonde93: Believe I saw it the first time around but forgot about it when you asked me to reconsider. Definitely didn't see it the second time around. It's borderline for revision deletion. I tend to be "stingy" with revdel because I've heard that the functionaries and arbitrators currently aren't fans of how admins tend to throw it around easily. I wouldn't object if you revdel'd it. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 17:39, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@BU Rob13: I'm undecided, too. I wasn't aware of dissatisfaction among the functionaries (could you point me to that, if you're able?) but this isn't a terribly serious case...although how seriously a person takes it probably depends on their background. On the balance I think I'll remove it because "better safe than sorry". Vanamonde (talk) 17:51, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was expressed to me off-wiki, Vanamonde93, so I'm unable to point to anything. I heard it from a single functionary, who was not speaking "officially" for the functionary group or the Committee, but they said it was a view that was held by many in that group. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 17:58, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 13 April 2017[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Sources should be tidied and trimmed. Too many unused sources in the article. 2001:E68:5436:D62:DD03:192A:4CA2:B50E (talk) 06:06, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done request does not include a complete and specific description of the request, so that an editor unfamiliar with the subject matter could complete the requested edit immediately. — xaosflux ^Talk 01:40, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Adding the following content deleted from the article for consideration:

Others facing sedition charges vow to fight on - The Star Online, Nation - http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2015/10/07/others-facing-sedition-charges-vow-to-fight-on/

Gender equality - everyone should speak up - The Star Online, In Your Face, Tan Yi Liang - http://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/online-exclusive/in-your-face/2015/11/04/all-genders-should-work-together/

Cop accused of rape threat still on duty pending probe - The Star Online, Nation, Nicholas Cheng - http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2015/05/20/crime-cop-rape-on-duty-investigation/

Selangor MB crisis: Lawyers for Liberty asks of Bon's role as human rights advocate - The Star Online, Nation, Tan Yi Liang - http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2014/08/15/selangor-mb-crisis-lawyers-at-liberty-reply-edmund-bon/

No dressing down rape issue, say netizens - The Star Online, Nation, Michelle Tam - http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2013/07/11/no-dressing-down-rape-issue/

Y'know, instead of edit-warring to keep external links in the article, you could incorporate the content in these references, and make the entire argument moot. Vanamonde (talk) 05:25, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]