Talk:Microloan Foundation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconCooperatives Start‑class (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Untitled[edit]

This page is not an advert for the organisation! I have been involved with the charity in the past, but I'm not one of the core team and I have written an objective, factual assessment of what they do. They are an organisation with a public profile within the world of microfinance and so warrant a wikipedia article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Mill (talkcontribs)

I'd agree with the above. Were this for some weird reason to come to AfD I would say Strong Keep. Quite why it's been speedy tagged I can't imagine. It no more reads like an advert than, say, Oxfam. Tonywalton  | Talk 13:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20180417023000/https://www.microloanfoundation.org.uk/about-us/our-impact/what-we-do/ and http://www.microloanfoundation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/2013_MLF-Annual-Report-and-financial-statements-Final-v1.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:06, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]