Talk:Missouri Route 48

Missouri Route 48 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 4, 2018. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Missouri Route 48 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 March 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that there is an eight-sided barn on Missouri Route 48?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Missouri Route 48.

Wikipedia

U.S. Roads: State highways / Missouri Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. state highways

Locations

Missouri

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	A fact from this article was featured on the Did you know? section of the U.S. Roads Portal in April 2018.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Missouri Route 48/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 07:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Pending
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	~~Maybe wikilink Route sooner?~~ No, that's the first time supplemental routes are mentioned.Nova Crystallis (Talk) ~~Link Rosendale, US 71, King City, US 169, Gentry County (in body of article)~~ Done.Nova Crystallis (Talk)
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Earwig is good, will check the PDFs when I go through them.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Color me surprised, it is stable!
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Tineye says the wiki version is the first version it found, rationales seem reasonable.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

~~Large Expense~~

~~Flood 1 Flood 2, maybe mention them if notable?~~

Added the first one, only significant floods are notable.

Sounds good. Kees08 (Talk)

~~Either in the caption or the body mention that the octoganol house is on the National Register.~~

Added.

~~Can we get some of the dollar amounts adjusted for inflation?~~

Done.