Talk:Murder of Selena/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Thehistorian10 (talk · contribs) 18:02, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
1. Well written[edit]
a. Concise[edit]
Comment: I find that the lead is very well written. Just from reading the lead, I can understand the idea of the article I am about to read. Spelling and grammar is perfect, with adequate use of accents for Spanish terms. It passes this subcategory ===b. Compliance with Manual of Style is evident. Due to the number of sources cited, the MOS guideline on fiction is irrelevant.
2. Verifiability and accuracy[edit]
This is very well passed. There are accurate descriptions of the event itself, with an entire "Impact" section, giving impacts of Selina's fans and any other impacts. The many sources proved relevant linking information and sources to reinforce the information provided in the article.
3. Broadness of range[edit]
The topic is very well covered - most of the article is dedicated to the Murder. The article does go off-topic slightly, whilst discussing Selina's music, although this can be interpreted as contextual information, and thus passes.
4. avoidance of bias[edit]
EAch opinion is given in equal weight. Due to the fact that this is a mostly factual article, the opinions that exist do not have great effect upon the overall article.
6. Stability[edit]
According to the edit history, only one editor has been working on this article for the previous month (the nominator). The article is therefore stable.
Illustrations[edit]
The article is illustrated with four photos. Only the principal image (near the top of the article) is adequately referenced. Images have captions which are relevant to the paragraph wherein the image is located. None contain re-use information.