Jump to content

Talk:NGC 695

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned references in NGC 695

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of NGC 695's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ned":

  • From List of NGC objects (1–1000): "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for various objects.
  • From NGC 953: NASA/JPL. "Database entry, NGC 953". NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database. Retrieved 2006-11-25. {{cite web}}: External link in |work= (help)
  • From NGC 514: "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for NGC 514. Retrieved 2006-11-25.
  • From NGC 625: "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for NGC 625. Retrieved 2006-12-19.
  • From Triangulum Galaxy: "Results for NGC 598". NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database. NASA/IPAC/JPL. Retrieved 2006-12-01.
  • From NGC 772: "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for NGC 772. Retrieved 2006-11-25.
  • From Messier 74: "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for NGC 628. Retrieved 2006-08-12.
  • From NGC 925: "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for NGC 925. Retrieved 2008-12-28.
  • From NGC 520: "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for NGC 520. Retrieved 2006-12-22.
  • From NGC 891: "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for NGC 891. Retrieved 2006-11-18.
  • From NGC 604: "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for NGC 604. Retrieved 2006-09-03.
  • From NGC 800: "NED results for object NGC 0800*". Extragalactic Database. NED. Retrieved 13 August 2013.
  • From NGC 784: "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database". Results for NGC 784. Retrieved 17 February 2013.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 19:16, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]