Jump to content

Talk:Nawal El Zoghbi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Nawal Al Zoghbi)

PHOTO

[edit]

There must be someone out there who owns the copyright of a few photos of Nawal

nawal is hot!

[edit]
Are you crazy to look like Nawal to Jennifer Lopez

COPYING spice girls -holler- video

[edit]
Are you crazy to look like Nawal to Jennifer Lopez

Clean Up

[edit]

the article is SO messy, I think it requires cleaning up! Some of the vital information are actually enlisted under "Trivia". I don't know why, but with that the article looks pretty 'Fan-Page' material. -- Omernos 20:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article's looking pretty good now, but there's a lot I have no information on at all (I'm just an Aussie, what would I know about Arabic music? :P), so feel free to leap in and add stuff about the copying of the video that was mentioned above. As a general rule, if a page neads cleanup, nobody's going to object if you have a good go at cleaning it up yourself. BigHaz 10:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I did 3 albums so far, I'll work on the rest later Omernos 11:57, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

page move

[edit]

Just thought I'd mention that I've moved the page to Al-Zoghbi (with a dash) to reflect the spelling used on her website and album covers. f(x)=ax2+bx+c 20:17, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

negative aspects of the article

[edit]

i feel that there is alot of information in this article that is reflecting nawal in a negative light, i.e. the spice girl video, the 'coppying' of mandam alaik and the 'failure' of the ablum 'maloum'. i am considering removing them, or editing them. please discuss - Rekuskid

Negative or positive, we're only interested in verifiable facts. If her video is indeed very similar to another one, or someone prominent states that the video looks like it was copied, then we can include it. Though the sections could probably be worded better (they've actually been removed...) I don't think they're biased. ~MDD4696 22:46, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nawal&lg.jpg

[edit]

Image:Nawal&lg.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nawalinghareeb.jpg

[edit]

Image:Nawalinghareeb.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:KhalasSm7t.jpg

[edit]

Image:KhalasSm7t.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Lastly Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV

[edit]

"She is a clever artist that knows very well how a diva image should be defined." Phrases such as this are inexcusable. Also, it needs more reliable sources. Copana2002 (talk) 22:38, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected

[edit]

This article has been semi-protected until July 12, 2010 due to edits by Brexx (see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Brexx/Archive). IP editors can use {{editsemiprotected}} to request edits, or make a request at WP:RFPP to have the article unprotected. Admins processing the unprotect requests are cautioned to ensure that the unprotection request does not come from Brexx (who has a history of using it), and editors evaluating editsemiprotected requests are cautioned to ensure the request does not come from Brexx.—Kww(talk) 01:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Her birth year is definitely NOT 1976. No way is she 35! In 1992 she released her first album, and she was about 20, or 21 then. In 1993 I was 10. How on earth can she be 13 when releasing her damn first album. This article needs major clean up! Nawal face your music, andrds with age as they grow older. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.223.101.214 (talk) 07:05, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nawal Al Zoghbi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:50, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:54, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]