Talk:Neverwinter Nights 2: Mask of the Betrayer/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

  1. Well-written:
  2. Green tickY
    (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; andGreen tickY
    (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.Green tickY
  3. Verifiable with no original research:
  4. Green tickY
    (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;Green tickY
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); andGreen tickY
    (c) it contains no original research.Green tickY
  5. Broad in its coverage:
  6. Green tickY
    (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; andGreen tickY
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).Green tickY
  7. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  8. Green tickY
  9. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  10. Green tickY
  11. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  12. Green tickY
    (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; andGreen tickY
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.Green tickY

PASS - A really nice read. An in-game screenshot of Mask's features would have been icing on the cake, but it isn't totally necessary.

Reviewer: Teancum (talk) 15:21, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) BOZ (talk) 15:30, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]