Talk:Niobium(V) ethoxide
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment. |
Group 11 Reviews[edit]
Review #1
You might be able to find more ChemBox information if you use the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. Under the production section, could you provide an image? That would add a lot to the description. Most of the sections look like they need a little more to them, but it looks like a good start! Skuhl2 (talk) 19:04, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Sarah Kuhl (skuhl2)
Review #2
The ChemBox looks good. I would suggest adding some pictures to the page. Pictures of the compound and how it reacts in production would be good visuals. I would also like to know more about how that chemical is produced in a reaction as well as any hazards that this chemical could cause - to human health or the environment. Does this chemical have any kind of interesting history that could be talked about? Mgonne2 (talk) 22:28, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Review #3
Add pictures!! the reactions are very confusing when just in script, if you can find a picture for the reaction mechanism it would be much more beneficial. Same with the chembox. Otherwise a lot different isomers are possible for the page. Also more information needs to be added to each of the sections of the pages. Also hazards are easy to find so I would suggest adding that section in for points.
Mngolden (talk) 16:30, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Review #4
I definitely agree with my fellow group members about adding pictures, at least one of the chemical itself to ad to the chembox. Also, I'm pretty sure you should be able to find some more hazard information (such as the GHS pictograms, hazard statements, and precautionary statements). This will definitely help add a lot more to the chembox. Defnitiely a great start, but overall it needs more information for each of the sections. You also may want to try to edit the look of the reaction to make it nicer and I was confused as to what that random 'Other' box was for.
Saposni2 (talk) 21:20, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Review #5
For the sections lacking information, I suggest you eventually delete them or find information. You might be able to find information on the history of the compound through SciFinder. In any case, SciFinder will most likely provide information towards the relevant uses of the compound (i.e are there any biological studies/uses?). Similar to my peers, I would suggest the enhancement of the chembox. Overall, the article is off to a good start, and the addition of relevant uses in research, biology, chemistry, etc. would enhance the article's quality. Jschlude2 (talk) 15:26, 2 November 2012 (UTC)