Jump to content

Talk:Most SNP

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Nový Most)

Title?

[edit]

Should this page be at New Bridge? dbenbenn | talk 02:01, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)

redirect

[edit]

New Bridge now redirects here. --Ondrejsv 18:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 22:20, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Most Slovenského národného povstaniaMost SNP – More used and easier name. Even the Slovakian Wikipedia is referring to this as 'Most SNP'. Wester (talk) 14:09, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's certainly an easier name, but a Google search for "Most Slovenského národného povstania" -wikipedia turns up many more results than "Most SNP" -wikipedia. Do you have any evidence that the name "Most SNP" is actually more commonly used? Knight of Truth (talk) 23:30, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Huh? Not that I would depend on them but I get 81 results for "Most Slovenského národného povstania" Bratislava -Wikipedia versus 239 results for ""Most SNP" Bratislava -Wikipedia. I added "Bratislava" to cut down on false matches for "Most SNP" (such as " I am much more radical in my 'nationalism' than most SNP members I know"). —  AjaxSmack  00:15, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, that's a good idea, cutting down on false positives that way. I can't see any particular reason to oppose, then, so you have my support. Knight of Truth (talk) 14:30, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Most SNP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with UFO (restaurant)

[edit]

Minimal referencing and would better go as a subsection of the article about the bridge. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 14:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Being BOLD and carrying out the merger on grounds that nobody will oppose. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 14:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]