Talk:Operation Pitting

Afghanistan Low‑importance

	Afghanistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / British / European / South Asia / Post-Cold War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Aeromedical Evacuation Squadron, TMW[edit]

@Rfghjkc:, instead of edit warring, I think it's more appropriate for us to discuss our differences with regards to each other's edits and hopefully come to a resolution.

These are the issues I have with your edits, which began here:

You cite no verifiable sources - As you probably know, everything you add needs to be verifiable via citations as per WP:VERIFY and WP:CITE.
- Your reference for "Aeromedical Evacuation Squadron, TMW", according to your edit summary, is an image. I checked the only image in your provided source, which is this but it's not verifiable; it's just a photo of a lone medic, taken from a distance, and there's no conclusive evidence, such as a patch, to suggest she's from "Aeromedical Evacuation Squadron, TMW".
- "1x Flight Nurse and 1x Flight Medic provided medical cover for each flight. 1xAELO coordinated patient evacuation from Kabul." - You provided no citations for this.
- In another edit summary you claimed your sources were RAF Regiment and No. 99 Squadron RAF social media posts but you didn't provide either with your edits. I tried to find them myself but couldn't so I asked you to provide them in a subsequent edit, which you didn't.
- You kept using broken references and duplicated another instead of using named references. Your account suggests you're fairly new so if you don't know how to reference properly I'm happy to reference for you if you provide me your sources. If not, check out WP:REFB.

You use jargon - This needs to be avoided as per WP:TECHNICAL. What are "AELO" and "TMW", for example? You need to word things in a way so that the widest possible audience can understand.

Ultimately, I appreciate your efforts and I'm convinced your edits are in good faith but I'm opposed to you repeatedly adding things without verifiable sources.

If anyone wants to provide a third opinion, feel free. TheArmchairSoldier (talk) 13:07, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook reference[edit]

@Maurice Oly: Could you please elaborate on why you’re so opposed to the inclusion of this reference?

https://www.facebook.com/airbornesappers/posts/1295645940906410

You’ve removed it a number of times, stating it’s against WP:UGC because it’s a social media source. I’m sure you’re aware that it’s not a binary issue and that some social media posts are permissible under some circumstances. I strongly believe this to be the case here. The source is an official RAF Facebook page publishing information released by the RAF. Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong — you’re clearly the more experienced editor here — but does that not make it usable as per WP:FACEBOOK? TheArmchairSoldier (talk) 15:36, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheArmchairSoldier: I generally prefer not to use Facebook as anybody can put anything on Facebook and claim it to be true.

I was however unaware of WP:FACEBOOK so with that in mind I will let facebook be used in this page due to the page being official RAF facebook page. Maurice Oly (talk) 15:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]