Talk:Paleorhinus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chatterjee (2001) petitioned the ICZN to replace the original type specimen of Parasuchus hislopi, a fragmentary premaxilla, with a complete skeleton. The ICZN (2003) officially designated a complete skeleton, ISIR 142, as the neotype of Parasuchus. Thus, Parasuchus is confined to India but the ICZN ruling does not render Paleorhinus a junior synonym of Parasuchus. After all, a revision of Paleorhinus is overdue (Stocker 2010).

Chatterjee, S. 2001. Parasuchus hislopi, 1885 (Reptilia, Archosauria): proposed replacement of the lectotype by a neotype. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 58(1): 34-36.

ICZN, 2003. Opinion 2045 (Case 3165). Parasuchus hislopi Lydekker, 1885 (Reptilia, Archosauria): lectotype replaced by a neotype. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 60(2).

Michelle R. Stocker (2010). "A new taxon of phytosaur (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia) from the Late Triassic (Norian) Sonsela Member (Chinle Formation) in Arizona, and a critical reevaluation of Leptosuchus Case, 1922". Palaeontology 53 (5): 997-1022. 68.4.61.237 (talk) 22:56, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

References[edit]

Here are the references:

A. P. Hunt and S. G. Lucas. 1991. The Paleorhinus biochron and the correlation of the non-marine Upper Triassic of Pangaea. Palaeontology 34(2):487-501

Michelle R. Stocker (2010). "A new taxon of phytosaur (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia) from the Late Triassic (Norian) Sonsela Member (Chinle Formation) in Arizona, and a critical reevaluation of Leptosuchus Case, 1922". Palaeontology 53 (5): 997-1022.68.4.61.237 (talk) 22:53, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

Paleorhinus paraphyly[edit]

The cladistic analysis of Stocker (2010) recovers the genus Paleorhinus is paraphyletic with respect to more advanced phytosaurs, with P. bransoni (the type species) and P. sawini being closer to advanced phytosaurs than P. scurriensis. However, Stocker did not include other putative synonyms of Paleorhinus in her analysis (Francosuchus, Ebrachosuchus, Arganarhinus, Mesorhinosuchus, and Promystriosuchus). Until a revision of Paleorhinus is undertaken, I would recommend placing Mesorhinosuchus, Francosuchus, and Promystriosuchus in separate pages.

M. R. Stocker. 2010. A new taxon of phytosaur (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia) from the Late Triassic (Norian) Sonsela Member (Chinle Formation) in Arizona, and a critical reevaluation of Leptosuchus Case, 1922. Palaeontology 53:997-1022. 68.4.61.168 (talk) 04:05, 19 May 2012 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]