Talk:Park Ravne 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is the name actually just "Park"[edit]

This article is ambiguous. What is "Park Ravne 2" actually and what is the name of this park? The article´says "Park Ravne 2", but within the article it is just called "Park" so what is it? Is it "a" park, thus the name isn't just "Park", or is it really named just "Park"? Is this a translation issue? 109.59.16.247 (talk) 06:56, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Biased article[edit]

This article is very biased against the claims and does not retain the neutrality characteristic of Wikipedia. It's tone is condescending towards the claims that counter the dogmas and opinions of a relatively small authoritarian group of archaeologists that are trying to push only a one-sided view as an absolute truth, contrary to the essence of science, ignoring the evidence of elaborate tunnels and building blocks. The pictures do not show these blocks that so many people witnessed with their own eyes. The opposite evidence is not well presented and when reading this article, it appears as if they were a priori dismissed by the authors, without non-biased post hoc analysis of presented facts. The facts themselves were not presented in a neutral fashion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.116.164.185 (talk) 23:44, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]