This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.
Hi - please read WP:MEDRS. This article has a lot of sourcing problems. I'm sorry if your instructor didn't go over our medical sourcing standards, but Wikipedia doesn't allow the use of primary sources etc in articles about medicine. I'm going to drop some cleanup tags on the page until the sourcing problems are addressed. Thanks, Kevin Gorman (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that encyclopedia articles cannot be based on primary sources. Please replace as many references as possible with either reviews or textbook content. Content that cannot be reliably sourced to either of these sources should be considered for removal from the article. JFW | T@lk 14:29, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate the feedback. For this specific topic, review articles are scarce. I have one review article, Perkes, et al., where much of the information in this article was found or supported. I do understand, though, that primary sources are not reliable for this type of article. I am working on finding additional secondary sources to replace unsupported information. Thanks. Kallen35 (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
