Talk:Petition to make special
|WikiProject Law||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
|I, the creator of this work, hereby grant the permission to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. Subject to disclaimers.
GFDL with disclaimers GNU Free Documentation License with disclaimers
|If this file is eligible for relicensing, it may also be used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license.
The relicensing status of this image has not yet been reviewed. You can help.
- This template will categorize into Category:Wikipedia license migration candidates.
Original version of article is excerpted from Nowotarski, Mark, Accelerated Examination, Insurance IP Bulletin, vol 2006.3, June 2006 .
- Nice article now. Thanks. --Edcolins 16:21, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Welcome. Nice clean up.--Nowa 17:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
pendency of five years?
I've moved the following text from the article to here: "the patent has an effective pendency of at least 5 years". I can't tell whether this is just WP:Patent Nonsense or whether it is a real patent law concept which could use some wording cleanups. The cited source (the MPEP) doesn't contain the word "pendency" nor any relevant occurrence of "year". If anyone knows what this sentence was trying to convey, please clarify. Kingdon (talk) 05:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)