Talk:Post-Agilism

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 December 2006. The result of the discussion was speedy merge.

Notable. Agile development is notable, and dated. Mathiastck 17:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Agile" may be notable, but is "post-agilism" notable? The term only seems to have been around for a few months and it looks to me as if it is mainly restricted to a few bloggers. Shouldn't it be shortened and merged (as a separate section) with Agile software development? --Boson 22:09, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see this article may be a "candidate for deletion". It seems like worthwhile commentary, and if the alternative is to lose it, it would be well placed in a (say) "Critcism of Agile" or maybe more neutral "Beyond Agile" section under Agile software development. 74.104.110.56 16:53, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can go with merging. There is enough here that I consider deletion inappropriate. Strangelv 14:57, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I started the AFD.. Perel 17:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]