Talk:Quagga mussel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge with zebra mussel?[edit]

The following note was put at the bottom of the zebra mussel article some months ago by an unknown user:

The entries on the Quagga mussel and the Zebra mussel should probably be merged into one entry concerning Dreissena species. Most of the information presented is North American in perspective perhaps because many Europeans have lived with these species for generations and are accustomed to the problems that these species cause.
One significant difference between the two species is that Quagga mussels can occur at greater depths than zebra mussels.

I'm anything but an expert on mussels, or anything biology, really. I just happened upon the zebra mussel article and was able to do some cleaning. I'm fine with merging the zebras and quaggas, but I can't do that. Can someone look into this? Any need for an "official" merger tag? ··· rWd · Talk ··· 19:53, 11 January 2006

I would say no; but cross linking the two pages would be very useful.

After looking at the excellent elephant page, I would say that merging the Zebra/quagga mussel pages would be justified. While zebra mussels are certainly more known, quagga mussels are a part of the zebra mussel story. I think a thoughtfully reworked and merged page would be better than the two short pages in their current form. Yes the two species are distinct, but the ecological issues that they present are very similar, their feeding, reproductive biology, and invasive characteristics are very similar. The primary ecological difference is one of depth range and temperature tolerance. A quagga photo would be essential before a merger.


I'm a geneticist and this sentence is unclear:

"Nonetheless, it is clear that the genus Dreissena is highly polymorphic and has a high potential for rapid adaptation to extreme environmental conditions by the evolution of allelic frequencies and combinations, possibly leading to significant long-term impacts on North American waters."

I would suggest removing "...by the evolution of allelic frequencies and combinations," since allelic frequency is a measure of diversity within a population. It's incoherent jargon and redundant since the author already stated that Dreissena is highly polymorphic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.231.88.7 (talk) 17:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edible?[edit]

Is it? Arbiteroftruth 03:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, technically, but so long as there is widespread pollution, it is not recommended (likely high in toxins)---read the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.28.244.122 (talk) 13:56, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


"eating them is not recommended due to the accumulation of toxins, pollutants, and microorganisms within the mussels' bodies." - This reads as if it's particular to the Quagga mussel. Is that the case? Or is this a general mussel warning? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.170.15.4 (talk) 12:43, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quagga Detection In Lake Tahoe[edit]

http://www.tahoedailytribune.com/article/20080828/NEWS/808289992

I am new to wikipedia. However, I thought that the above link discussing a recent quagga detection and quarantine of a boat about to be launched in Lake Tahoe is notable. Especially in light of the article's discussion of the quagga in the Lower Colorado River basin and boat ban at Lake Casitas. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.12.154.236 (talk) 18:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quagga mussel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Quagga mussel[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Quagga mussel's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "iucn":

  • From List of fauna of Utah: NatureServe. (2013). "Cottus echinatus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2013: e.T5438A15361621. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-1.RLTS.T5438A15361621.en. Retrieved 24 October 2020.
  • From Synonym (taxonomy): " Bubo scandiacus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2017: e.T22689055A119342767. 2017. Retrieved 10 December 2017. {{cite journal}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors= (help)
  • From Black Sea: Karamanlidis, A.; Dendrinos, P. (2015). "Monachus monachus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2015: e.T13653A45227543. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T13653A45227543.en.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quagga Mussels Detected in Southern Idaho[edit]

Here are two developments:

Take them what you will. -- Apisite (talk) 06:47, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Quagga_mussel&oldid=1204970529"