Talk:Risk management plan

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Systems Low‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Project management.

Untitled

This entry belongs in wiktionary. Mathiastck 17:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was PAGE MOVED to unhyphenated version. If the hyphenated version is more common in English-language sources, then we should move it there, but let's see the sources first. This move was uncontroversially an improvement, even if it's not optimal. -GTBacchus^(talk) 00:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Risk management plan, which now redirects to Risk management; alternatively merge to Risk management. – Leo Laursen – ✍ ⌘ 08:03, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support move, simple housekeeping to comply with naming conventions. Deal with the merge later. Andrewa (talk) 22:41, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sensible idea Knepflerle (talk) 13:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Isn't it more properly at Risk-management plan, grammatically speaking? ~ JohnnyMrNinja 11:11, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Article Change Management

The PMBoK Guide ($40-) was recently updated in the references (5th edition, 2013), but the definition of project risk looks like an older one? Also the page number (373) is unlikely to be the same after two revisions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.183.224.2 (talk) 21:58, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Add 'Eliminate' as an alternative term for the 'Avoid' strategy to manage risk

For many years, I have used the term 'Eliminate' instead of 'Avoid' as the first strategy to manage risk - however, I cannot remember where (and don't have time just at the moment to research it) to reference it. So my proposed change, if anyone can find the citation, would be to simply add 'Eliminate' in brackets after 'Avoid' just like the other strategies to manage risk have other common terms.

Oops, should have just looked at the Risk Management page on Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_management)! On that page, it has Eliminate in brackets after Avoidance in the 'Potential risk treatments' section.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Brett-Aus (talk • contribs) 06:45, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Risk plan

4 197.189.161.194 (talk) 04:04, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]