Talk:SA Waste Holdings

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeSA Waste Holdings was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 11, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed

Ga Review[edit]

This article needs further expansion and elaboration to pass GA.

  • The footnote refs need to placed immediately after the punctuation.
Done --GrahamDo (talk) 12:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Single sentence refs need to be eliminated by integrating/expanding the information.
  • There are business/budget type statistics and administration statistics missing from the article. How is the business run? Board/CEO elections, shareholder info, budget, revenue, expansion, takeover bids, profits, stocke xchange listing, AGM type info.
CEO is Herman Ackermann (And I've now referenced that fact). The company is a private (unlisted) company, so any other information wrt to financials, exact running of the company, is proprietory information and cannot (easily) be obtained. Anyone find any references to this information, be my guest and add it! :) --GrahamDo (talk) 12:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article lacks info on the pre-2000 operations of the company. How did evolve to reach its current status. Where were its roots, how did it expand its operations and so forth.
  • The controversy needs to be expalined better, as the article does not explain why the company were in trouble, eg illegal dumping, unenvironmental practices and so forth.
Done --GrahamDo (talk) 12:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lead needs to be expanded and needs to summarise the main body. At the moment the lead is used to introduce new information not elaborated upon in the lead.
  • It would be good to expand on what their BEE policy is wrt affirmative action and so forth.
  • The extent of operations needs to be better explained because at hte moment the article only tells us who has hired the grouop, but not what responsibilties they have, eg - how much tonnage of waste do they collect, how many households do they service, etc.
Done, kind of. No information is available on tonnages and such, but I have expanded on the services provided to Vodacom, and pointed out that the company is not permitted to collect residential waste. --GrahamDo (talk) 12:36, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Best regards, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:15, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References Needed[edit]

I couldn't find many references other than the May 2005 debacle, and what information I can glean from their own company website. If anybody has any reference to the history of the company, etc, please post update the article. :) --GrahamDo (talk) 22:47, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm particularly interested in when this "Reach For a Dream" record attempt occurred GrahamDo (talk) 13:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, the event took place on 7 July at Cresta, but am still not sure of the year. :( GrahamDo (talk) 08:12, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Got it! 7 July 2005. :-) GrahamDo (talk) 08:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on SA Waste Holdings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:47, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on SA Waste Holdings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on SA Waste Holdings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:59, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]