Talk:San Francisco City Clinic

A fact from San Francisco City Clinic appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 December 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that San Francisco City Clinic is a specialty municipal sexual health center that opened in 1933 and serves people over the age of 12?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/December.

Wikipedia

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Transportation section non-encyclopedic[edit]

Should probably not be here. Otherwise the article looks good. <( User:Couch on his Head and Smiling (talk) )> 05:49, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

unique[edit]

this place is unique, is why is has an article, the sources even say that municipal sexual health centers are unheard of, furthermore it has been open since 1933, making it one of the oldest, its the only publicly operated standalone sex center in california, if not beyondThisbites (talk) 23:34, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed "rather unique" when I promoted this article to the DYK prep queue because "rather unique" is (1) ungrammatical, and (2) a peacock term, and neither of those things should appear in an article linked from the front page. I'd prefer if you (or someone else) came up with a better word choice if you think adjectives are appropriate there, but if you insist on keeping "rather unique" in there I'm certainly not going to edit-war over it. Seriously, though, consider a better word choice. 28bytes (talk) 02:48, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]