Talk:Sarah Charlesworth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Please do not delete this stub. This article - and other stubs I am creating from the List of photographers page is intended to provide authoritative basic biographical information on photographers who do not yet have full articles. As such, these stubs should help to clarify which of the photographers on the list are deserving of full articles and of being included on the list, i.e. if authoritative bio info cannot be found from Union List of Artist Names, Library of Congress Authorities or another source (e.g. the CCA online database) then the photographer in question probably doesn't deserve a fuller article or inclusion on the list. Pinkville 20:51, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've called her "well-known" which suffices as a claim of notability, so speedy won't apply. If someone wants this deleted, they'll have to go to AfD or Prod with it. Mangojuicetalk 20:36, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea! I'll use your inclusion in future. Pinkville 22:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blimey, we have come a long way since 2006![edit]

LOL. Maybe back in 2006 it was enough to assert that a person was "well known" to see off deletion. I don't think that will wash now. We need proof that she is a notable artist. This means things like solo shows at notable galleries, non-trivial coverage in the press or books, works in major collections, that sort of thing. I was going to put a PROD on this but a little Googling suggests that she may, or may not, be notable enough. I have tagged for notability instead. --The "Well Known" DanielRigal (talk) 22:46, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sarah Charlesworth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]