Talk:Seychelles women's national football team/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 13:07, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Minor details[edit]

I few minor details before giving my final review:

  • The article states that football is the 3rd most popular sport, and one of the more popular ones is volleyball, what is the other one? If you can't find a source, then perhaps you can reword the sentence so that it doesn't appear so obvious of a question to the reader.
    • Removed ", trailing behind volleyball." to not list the most popular. I can't find a source for it. --LauraHale (talk) 09:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Teams such as the Dolphins and Lioness' are mentioned, but little is said about them. Are the teams located in different cities/islands? On that question, being that the Seychelles is made up of multiple islands, where does the Seychelles Football Federation reside? --Tea with toast (話) 14:35, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not sure what else can be said about them other than they won those championships. I'm worried about adding to much to this section because it would probably be undue weight in a section about background and development to explain why the national team is in the state it is. As for where the national federation is located, no idea. Internal geography really wasn't something mentioned as a contributing factor to the national team's lack of development. --LauraHale (talk) 09:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Final review[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    --Tea with toast (話) 23:52, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]