UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Kent C‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

C

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Ridgewaye football

Untitled

I think the original article on Ridgewaye was suitable for an encyclopedia. I would like to see similar information on the cricket club. Our town coat of arms has a brick and a cricket ball - industry and sport - and Wikipedia should reflect this.--JohnWPFrancis (talk) 13:13, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it is appropriate to have information about the team, but the amount of information and the style weren't appropriate, for example "This demonstrates the level of coaching quality (the FA Junior Team Managers Levels one & two), administration and a full child protection policy." is not suitable in my view. The whole of the next section is of very little interest to people not directly involved with the club and would need citations. The section after that is alright. The section afterwards is borderline. The section beginning "This project has been overseen..." is not worth putting in an encyclopaedia, and this applies to most but not all of the rest. It all seems like an advert for the club and a way for the people who run the club to congratulate themselves on wikipedia! (Edmund1989 (talk) 17:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I hope my edit is an acceptable compromise. The majority of the reposted material has been kept, including the external link. A long list of names is not interesting to people looking for information about Southborough. A couple of citations are also needed. (Edmund1989 (talk) 20:39, 3 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and the content about the football club does not fit the style and content guidelines of Wikipedia. If the material is heavily reworked, it might go in the article, but such a long section seems unsuited to an article about the town. (Edmund1989 (talk) 16:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

This of course is YOUR view. Ridgewaye Football club is the largest youth organisation in Southborough, has now over 300 members,over 50 support staff who all work on a voluntary basis. The club is therefore a major part of the life of Southborough youth and should form a part of the information on the area. Please refraine from deleting this article again.[17:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulgilden (talk • contribs)

I disagree with your view on this section. There may well be a place for the football team in the Southborough article, but the section is far too long, and with this in mind I have moved it to a page devoted to the club which is linked to in the article. I have not dealt with the problems in the style and content of the article, but I have labelled them. (Edmund1989 (talk) 23:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Southborough, Kent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:19, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]