Talk:Southern California Association of Governments

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Critics, such as urban scholar Joel Kotkin, state that SCAG's projections are frequently out of line of reality and that the agency is irrelevant in a suburbanizing world." I would propose that the first sentence in the Criticism subheading is irrelevant to the discussion of SCAG, and more a discussion on transportation planning in general (pro suburbanization versus pro "smart Growth." In addition, with the current federal policies (2009) proposing high speed rail, the argument that SCAG is still pursuing it is moot. 64.161.191.145 (talk) 21:32, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noting that it was me that wrote the above. Alanthompson (talk) 21:33, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regional planning[edit]

Said section seems to be SCAG memos. Doesn't seem right for Wikipedia. Lots42 (talk) 20:58, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]