Talk:Tathāgatagarbha Sūtra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Thanks to "RI" for improving the article on "Tathagatagarbha Sutra" by adding a couple of valuable "wikifications" to it. Thanks, RI ! Best wishes, from Tony TonyMPNS 21:34, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Citations[edit]

There are none. This appears to be someone's essay? I have added some cited material but the rest needs to be supported. Mitsube (talk) 21:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Respect of the doctrine[edit]

This is the first paragraph before the changes: The Tathāgatagarbha Sūtra is an influential and doctrinally striking Mahāyāna Buddhist scripture which treats of the existence of the "Tathāgatagarbha" (Buddha-Matrix, Buddha-Embryo, Buddha-Essence, lit. "the womb of the thus-come-one") within all sentient creatures. The Buddha reveals how inside each person's being there exists a great Buddhic "treasure that is eternal and unchanging". This is no less than the indwelling Buddha himself.

In the first paragraph, there are three expressions or words that should, in my view, be adjusted or better, completely changed. The first word is "Buddha-Essence". As you may know, Śūnyatā is a central concept of Mahāyāna Buddhist scripture which refer explicitely to the "emptiness of beings and things, their absence of being in itself (anātman) and of proper nature (svabhāva), in other words the non-existence of any essence, of any fixed and unchanging character." There is no such thing as an "essence" in oriental wisdom as the sacred in immanent in nature, not transcendent. Essence and transcendance are metaphysical concepts of the Western world. Even time has no inherent existence for Buddhism. I would just erase this concept from the text. Buddha-Matrix, Buddha-Embryo are pedagogical concept that can stay.

"treasure that is eternal and unchanging": In Buddhism, the three marks of existence are three characteristics (Pali: tilakkhaṇa; Sanskrit: त्रिलक्षण, trilakṣaṇa) of all existence and beings, namely impermanence (aniccā), non-self (anattā) and unsatisfactoriness or suffering (dukkha). Saying that something is "eternal" and "unchanging" of Buddha-nature is very clumsy as these concepts derive directly from abrahamic religions. Buddha-nature has a wide range of (sometimes conflicting) meanings in Indian and later East Asian and Tibetan Buddhist literature. "Broadly speaking, the terms refer to the potential for all sentient beings to be a Buddha, the natural and true state of the mind, the pure (visuddhi) mind undefiled by kleshas, is inherently present in every sentient being." (see Buddha-nature article.) The potential of becoming or being a Buddha has nothing to do with with eternity or an unchanging feature.

The Tathāgatagarbha Sūtra is an influential and doctrinally striking Mahāyāna Buddhist scripture which treats of the existence of the "Tathāgatagarbha" (Buddha-Matrix, Buddha-Embryo, lit. "the womb of the thus-come-one") within all sentient creatures. According to the Buddha, all sentient beings are born with buddha-nature and have the potential to become a Buddha. Physical and mental defilements of evertday life acts as clouds over the this very nature and usually prevents this realization. This nature is no less than the indwelling Buddha himself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pve73 (talkcontribs) 14:04, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Professor Michael Zimmermann[edit]

Thanks to User:Anam Gumnam for making us aware of the full and impressive credentials of Buddhist scholar, Professor Michael Zimmermann. I had indeed known that Dr. Zimmermann had written very fully and cogently on the Tathagatagarbha Sutra for his doctoral dissertation, but had not noticed that he is in fact now a university professor. Thanks for your postings, Anam, which I invariably find very scholarly and highly informative. Suddha (talk) 01:26, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Tathāgatagarbha Sūtra. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Tathāgatagarbha Sūtra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]