Talk:Ten Thousand Buddhas Monastery/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
I'll take a look and jot notes below - I will make straightforward copyedits as I go (please revert if I accidentally change the meaning) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
as having "undermined" the building's historic "authenticity". - there will be words that can be used for "undermined" and...what is "authenticity" supposed to mean anyway. Style?
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources: (NB: Earwigs copyvio detector was negative/clear
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: - the only issue here is about gallery use. I'm not normally keen on them, but this is a visually diverse place, and do feel that on the balance of things this adds to the article.
Overall: