Talk:Terry Sanford/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jon698 (talk · contribs) 12:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Indy beetle: I am going to begin reviewing this article sometime this day. Jon698 (talk) 12:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Absolutely no problems with the writing. The main thing my edits did was to restructure the sentences so that less of them started with dates.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
I have spent the past few hours reading the sources through the Internet Archive. All of the information that is purported to be sourced in those references is found there. There were some problems with the text being too similar to the way it is stated in the source, but that was a minor problem I fixed.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
The article covers the entirety of his life. It includes his early life and education, military service, early political career, gubernatorial career, presidency of Duke University, senatorial career, and later life.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
The article is neutral and has no conflict of interest.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
No edit wars and the most recent edits before mine were a week ago.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The image selection is good and there are a lot of images.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Another great job @Indy beetle: and another feather for your cap. Jon698 (talk) 20:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]