Talk:The Cooper Temple Clause

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Alternative music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kieran Mahon was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 April 2010 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into The Cooper Temple Clause. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Daniel Fisher was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 April 2010 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into The Cooper Temple Clause. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Morning Records[edit]

Why no mention of the record company that they founded to release their earlier work?

Misc[edit]

the band name was choosen as a result of the members having a regular hang-out spot at the cooper's bmw dealership in reading on temple retail estate. They vowed to form a rock band, hence clause.

I'm not sure they play Britpop.--Cdaze 12:56, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop removing the band split section

Fair use rationale for Image:KUTFALTFBL.jpg[edit]

Image:KUTFALTFBL.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:STTAL.jpg[edit]

Image:STTAL.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Cooper Temple Clause[edit]

I'm helping out my friends at tourdates.co.uk and I know there is a profile on The Cooper Temple Clause on the site which I think is worth linking to because it has gig listings, reviews and news. If anybody else agrees please could you add SPAM the related links section?

Mayleaf 12:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the fact that the band have now disbanded, I don't know that gig listings are of much use to wikipedia users. --Featherfin 20:06, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam removed. Neil ム 15:41, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Label politics - Sanctury Records[edit]

I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw what the band had been reduced to. I saw them play in 2004 in front of a sell out show in Birmingham to an audience of about 2000 - 2500 strong. I saw them again in 2007 play to 200 people in the upstairs room at the Bristol Academy. Both shows were great and they played like true professionals, I was in awe.

They are a sad example of a great, great band who's demise was due to poor funding. Hardly any promotion could be seen when 'Make This Your Own' came out and their touring was reduced to a mere club circuit.

Maybe their demise was due to the knock on effect of the losses incurred by Sanctuary in 05 and a reluctance for the label to invest in them whilst the handover to Universal was happening.

What a waste of such an amazing band. In fact one of the last great bands which we have seen. They were always terribly underrated.

The best ones always are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bruceysbonus1 (talk • contribs) 21:01, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I somewhat agree, but WP:NOT#FORUM and WP:NOT#SOAPBOX. Wikipedia is not the place to talk about it.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 23:05, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on The Cooper Temple Clause. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:02, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]