Talk:The Fawn (album)

Fair use rationale for Image:Fawnalbum.jpg[edit]

Image:Fawnalbum.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

@Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: articles have been created for all eleven of the band's albums per WP:N, what exactly makes The Fawn the exception? As much info is added to the article as the other albums. Ellokk (talk) 19:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The other articles have more than just a reference to an AllMusic review. Each article has to meet notability requirements on its own merits, meaning each one has had to receive significant coverage in multiple, reliable sources per WP:NALBUMS. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:12, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The album has been reviewed by The Washington Post, The A.V. Club. Ellokk (talk) 19:18, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They aren't present in the article. That's why I placed the tag, so individuals knowledgeable on the topic can add appropriate sourcing to establish its notability. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The reviews do not give a final score, how do you suggest incorporating them into the article? Ellokk (talk) 19:28, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews don't need a final score. The ratings box is secondary to prose. It's best to summarize the contents of each review or note the general consensus of multiple reviews. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:41, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure there's a better way to incorporate the sources, but for the meantime, I did this. Ellokk (talk) 19:43, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do to add a critical reception section from those when I have a little more time to dedicate to it. After that, others will be free to expand should they have more to offer. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:48, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]