Talk:The Hidden Oracle/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sagecandor (talk · contribs) 16:55, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Review I shall do. Sagecandor (talk) 16:55, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 12, 2017, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: The article is quite well written. Per Good Article Criteria 1a, the writing presents as "clear and concise". I agree with this characterization for this article's writing quality. It has a bit of improvement to go for Featured Article, but it is good enough right now for Good Article.

2. Verifiable?: I checked over the citations and the article is extremely well cited. Every single fact has a citation. The Plot and Characters sections do not require secondary sources if no inferences on the part of the Wikipedia editor are being made and it is purely descriptive text and matter of fact, which, in this case, it is, per WP:PLOTSUMMARY.

3. Broad in coverage?: The article is thorough and in-depth, covering multiple aspects of the topic including: Development and promotion, Plot, Characters, Release, Reception, and Sequel. I moved around some order and made some minor tweaks as executive action by good article reviewer.

4. Neutral point of view?: The article is written in a neutral tone. The introduction is of appropriate length and summarizes the article's contents well. The introduction tells the reader in a succinct manner why the article topic is notable.

5. Stable? Article was only created in May 2017. But length of time article has existed prior to GA Nomination is not a criteria of the WP:WIAGA for stability. Merely that "it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute". Based on that exact criteria, the article is stable.

6. Images?: One image used. File:The Hidden Oracle.jpg. Fair use asserted. Good fair use rationale on image page.

Good job. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Sagecandor (talk) 18:19, 12 June 2017 (UTC)