Talk:The Militant

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Disambiguation[edit]

Shouldn't these two papers be handled with a disambig instead of lumped on one page? -- Jmabel | Talk 07:26, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

Pathfinder[edit]

Why was this removed: "In recent years it has become the international paper of record of the Pathfinder Tendency." I believe that is correct. - Jmabel | Talk 17:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is the "Pathfinder tendency"? I see it as a POV term used in a derogatory sense. I think it is better to simply say that the Militant is an international paper, written by and distributed by communists in different contries. Bronks 11:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see nothing derogatory about the term Pathfinder Tendency. It is not an official name, but you have to call it something to distinguish it from communists of other tendencies. And because they do distribute Pathfinder books it is descriptive.Dolaro 18:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do as you please, I don't really care... But I think it is wrong to use the words ""In recent years it has become..." - becouse in that case, it has always been! Bronks 18:50, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I made an attempt to include the PT words, hope you think it's okay this way. Bronks 18:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

This article has no sources for its statements. It would really help if those who wrote it would include some refrences paticularly on the history section. 216.255.11.145 (talk) 06:23, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed tag[edit]

Just to clairfy the citation needed tag, the article states, "To protect the party and the paper, The Militant is owned by a private group..." I am just a bit curious as to how, and from whom, this is meant to protect the party. Hammersbach (talk) 21:57, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy[edit]

I removed the controversy section. It has ^{[citation needed]} since more than half a year and is still unsourced. MrBurns (talk) 05:17, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]