Talk:The Raven (The Stranglers album)

Don't Bring Harry

"Don't Bring Harry" doesn't have "just piano accompaniment", it also has drums, bass guitar, and electric guitar. You can prove this by listening to it with your ears.--feline1 18:07, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Stranglers - Dead Los Angeles excerpt.ogg

Image:Stranglers - Dead Los Angeles excerpt.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Stranglers - The Raven album cover.jpg

Image:Stranglers - The Raven album cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duchess controversy

It has been suggested that the reason for the banning by the BBC had more to do with the content of the song, since some of the lyrics can be characterized as a criticism of Princess Margaret. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.233.136.166 (talk) 20:36, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duchess was not banned by the BBC. The track was played uncensored and unedited in the Radio 1 Top 40 show at the time - thats where I first heard it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.210.159.248 (talk) 01:44, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yellowcake UF6

Three things regarding "Yellowcake UF6":

The title is two references to uranium refining: see Yellowcake and Uranium hexafluoride.
In the UK (at least) it was the "B" side to "Nuclear Device (The Wizard of Aus)" (United Artists BP 318).
Some (all?) CDs in the UK (other places?) incorrectly give the title as "Yellowcake UFO". This is probably caused by somebody at the record company not being aware of the above.

--Redrose64 (talk) 16:35, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Raven (The Stranglers album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140713010959/http://strangled.co.uk/spiked.htm to http://www.strangled.co.uk/spiked.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]