Talk:The Right Brothers
This article was nominated for deletion on 18 February 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Starting the article
[edit]Starting the article with "They have been highly ridiculed" is not a good way to go. Mentioning their criticism makes perfect sense, but to simply state they are ridiculed as an introduction to who they are is rediculous.
It also makes the claim that they ahve gained "notoriety" for supporting Bush and the Iraq War. Whether its notoriety or not is a matter of opinion. Recognition would be a much more neutral word.
This article also claims that events since the releasing of the song "Bush was Right" have proved Bush wasnt right. This is not NPOV.
- "Recognition" isn't quite as POV as "notoriety," but it has a definite positive connotation. john k (talk) 18:35, 16 January 2009 (UTC)