Talk:Toccata and Fugue in F major, BWV 540

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"...sounds simular [sic] to..."[edit]

This piece sounds like this one fugue, and this other one, because maybe they both use eighth notes instead of sixteenth notes? Amateurish. Entire paragraph removed. Steve Shuck 14:13, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know what fugue your talking about! The of Bach's Dorian Toccata and Fugue in D minor, BWV 538. Ironically, I mentioned that yesterday on the article for BWV 538! It's probibly a coincident, but you may be talking about another work, though. Go and read the articles for BWV 540 and BWV 538 for more info chuck. Aaron Pepin 12:12, 23 June 2006

Fair use rationale for Image:Deceptive.jpg[edit]

Image:Deceptive.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harmonic sequence[edit]

This bit doesn't seem to make any harmonic sense to me... maybe we could have a musical example or simply a reduction to chords to illustrate it? I can't make head or tail of it; it doesn't seem to make sense. "45 measures after the second pedal solo there is a dominant chord which resolves deceptively to the third-inversion dominant applied to the neapolitan. In particular, the doubled root is found to move outward in contrary chromatic motion to a major 9th; in the bass is a descending augmented unison, which absolutely could not be farther from the expected fifth. Bach implements this powerful deceptive cadence three times in the piece; it would not become idiomatic until Chopin and Tchaikovsky". Also, perhaps bracket that a 'deceptive cadence' is more usually known as an imperfect cadence for ease of reading. - Nessa Ancalimë ♥ (talk) 20:00, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only 3-movement organ piece?[edit]

This part, about BWV 564 being Bach's only 3-movement organ piece, is false. BWV 525-530 are all three-movement sonatas for organ. Leisuresuit (talk) 00:27, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Only "thorough-going" double fugue?[edit]

"The Fugue is Bach's only thorough-going double fugue, where two subjects are exposed in separate sections and then combined." This is not true. BWV 574, while based on a theme by Legrenzi, does exactly this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:522B:1E00:6DDC:B3B2:DF53:5C4C (talk) 10:35, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deceptive cadence - placement[edit]

I'm not a music theorist but I believe it's at bar 36 (not 45) after the second pedal solo the deceptive cadence with the neapolitan is located. Don't want to edit the text without being sure. I used this score: https://s9.imslp.org/files/imglnks/usimg/2/28/IMSLP355046-PMLP111720-LOEB_45379053.pdf Oortone (talk) 10:34, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]