Talk:USS Neosho (1863)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Buggie111 (talk · contribs) 19:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC) Neosho always seemed like a pretty awesome name whenever I read it. Nice to see that's she's been brought up to potential GAN status![reply]

Review:

Anything to flesh out the "See also page"? Sister ships? Looks kinda silly with just a book and portal link,
- I switched it to an inline ref, rather than that honking big image. Don't even know why there's a book since I haven't even submitted it for a good topic yet.
Could possibly trim the caption under the Nashville pic. Don't think it's necessary to keep the author's description.
- Done.
Link or explain what a flying battery is (I assume it's a group of horse drawn heavy guns, correct me if I'm wrong)
- Linked, although I really should specify that they're light guns intended to be very mobile on the battlefield. But I'm just not up to adding it to the article or creating a new one right now.
"Official Records of the Union and Confederate Navies in the War of the Rebellion" doesn't seem to be used in the article, yet is listed at the bottom as a source.
- Moved to further reading.

All I can see. Buggie111 (talk) 19:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- Gotta say that I'm really liking the quick reviews for my GANs. Thanks for helping out.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm sorry, I forgot the procedural "I Buggie111, as a WikiCup contestant, do solemnly swear that I am not be paying in any medium of currency by Sturmvogel 66 or in any tit-for-tat favors and the fact that I happen to only be reviewing his GAN's is purely coincidental." Pass. Buggie111 (talk) 13:20, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]