Talk:USS Windham Bay/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 03:15, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Design and description
- "Standardized with her sister ships, she was 512 ft 3 in (156.13 m) long overall, at the waterline, she was 490 ft (150 m) long, she had a beam of 65 ft 2 in (19.86 m), at her widest point, this was 108 ft (33 m), and a draft of 20 ft 9 in (6.32 m). " - Since one of these list items includes a comma, set the different measurements apart with semicolons, not commas.
- Service history
- "which had recently been secured" - Linking only secured to the battle violates MOS:EGG, I'd recommend expanding the piped link to include the whole phrase of "had recently been secured"
- Link or gloss what CVE stands for (not the hull number, the other usage)
- Infobox
- The exact dates of the second decommission and the selling for scrap aren't cited anywhere.
- Selling for scrap is cited in Hazegray and DANFs.
- Images
- "spent away from the frontline carriers." - is MOS:SANDWICHed between the first two images, this needs corrected.
- The final image cuts way below the actual text itself. Honestly, there's one too many image in the article, so one needs removed.
- Layout
- Nix the See also section, it's empty
- Move the portal bar to between the commons cat link and the top template
Sources and image licensing look acceptable enough. Placing on hold. Hog Farm Bacon 00:28, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Hog Farm: I've addressed your points. Stikkyy t/c 06:10, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Stikkyy: Those two dates need cited inline. We need the exact date, not just the month for the one, and the whole date for the other. Hog Farm Bacon 13:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)