Talk:Venetica/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Abryn (talk · contribs) 21:09, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• The paragraph about bugs feels like it could be reduced in terms of examples.
• I was not able to find the screenshot when I checked Deck13 Interactive, though I haven't checked Rombax Games or dtp entertainment's websites. Can you put a link onto this (as well as a link to the page with the cover art shown)?
  • I took the screenshot myself ingame, so there is indeed no link for it. I don't think that's a problem though, since anyone can verify the screenshot by playing the game. I'll add a link for the cover (which was there before I worked on it). Regards SoWhy 09:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
    • In that case, looks good. Nice job with an interesting subject. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 15:13, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

      @Abryn: Wow, thanks for the quick and helpful review! I really appreciate it! Regards SoWhy 16:33, 1 September 2019 (UTC)