Talk:Waiting for the End

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability[edit]

The song charted, even before released as a single officially.

http://www.billboard.com/#/song/linkin-park/waiting-for-the-end/22634911

Two articles[edit]

There are now two "Waiting for the End" articles: Waiting for the End and Waiting for the End (song) --Djlordi (talk) 19:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

:Oh, I had no idea about that. I saw links to that page, but I thought it was just a redirect, like Waiting For The End (Linkin Park song). From the revision history, it looks like Kevon100 and myself created the same basic article a few minutes apart. Should the other redirect to this one or vice versa? In my opinion, the title of this one is simpler (and this page has technically been around longer as a redirect, until today). Friginator (talk) 20:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Okay, it looks like Kevon100 added a speedy deletion template to Waiting for the End (song). I left a message on his talk page about it. I still think it should be a redirect instead, to avoid potential confusion. Friginator (talk) 20:10, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it was just deleted. Friginator (talk) 20:12, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's actually three still two: Waiting For The End (Linkin Park song). ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② talk 13:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
From what I can see, Waiting For The End (Linkin Park song) redirects to the same page as Waiting for the End... Salvidrim (talk) 20:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cover art[edit]

Who delete the white cover of the single? It is the cover of the promotional single an not of the official single. --SuperVirtual (talk) 15:29, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Reggae Rock[edit]

Reggae Rock? I mean, REGGAE ROCK? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergiohsilva100 (talkcontribs) 01:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 March 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: procedural close, should be listed at WP:RMT as a request to revert an undiscussed move. (non-admin closure). sst✈ 05:17, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Waiting for the End (Linkin Park song)Waiting for the End – Article was moved in October for no reason other than the existence of a not remotely notable song of the same name. Unreal7 (talk) 16:11, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. The Linkin Park song article gets 99 percent (?!?) of the pageviews between the two articles. Dohn joe (talk) 20:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 22 March 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Waiting for the End (Linkin Park song)Waiting for the End – Request to revert undiscussed, unexplained move. Only notable topic with this title. – sst✈ 05:19, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SSTflyer: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:54, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • And before that, move existing Waiting for the End to Waiting for the End (disambiguation).
  • How long will the song Waiting for the End by Linkin Park be notable? Pop music songs are nearly always ephemeral. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:54, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural close as per above. User:Anthony Appleyard: please act as an administrator and not as an editor when presented with requests to revert undiscussed moves - they should be done nearly automatically, as others have explained to you many times. If you personally disagree with the move, you may start your own RM - from the status quo title. Dohn joe (talk) 16:50, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Waiting for the End. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]