Talk:Young Greens of England and Wales

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Green Politics (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Politics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject Green PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Green PoliticsGreen Politics articles

Formatting issues

I've copied what follows from the Green Party of England and Wales discussion page, and have made some editorial changes in line with reducing the size of linked passages and not overlinking.

Gordon 16:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page had become rather jumbled through the recent (and very informative) expansions. I have tried to bring it in line with the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. In particular:

I have adjusted the headings to follow the standard format used in Wikipedia, i.e., the first heading level is formatted using two equal signs, and the second heading level is formatted using three equal signs.
Words in headings are not capitalised unless they are the first word in the heading, or proper nouns. See WP:MOSHEAD.
Other Wikipedia articles are linked only once, unless the article is long, in which case they may be linked again later in the article. There is no need to link the same article several times in the same paragraph. See WP:LINK.
Ordinary words are not linked. See WP:CONTEXT.
We try not to make the linked passages bigger than necessary, so Dr. [[Ranjit Singh]], MEP , rather than [[Ranjit Sngh|Dr. Ranjit Singh, MEP]].

Regards, Ground Zero | t 22:37, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Definite Article

The definite article is not used at the start of this article but is used elsewhere. The YG constitution doesn't use it but elsewhere I think it is usually (but not always) used. Perhaps, a parenthesis would be appropriate; however, it should still be consistent in the article.

Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley _talk _contrib 10:48, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hatnote

My deletion of the hatnote as it is non-disambiguating (in violation of WP:HN#Disambiguating_article_names_that_are_not_ambiguous) was reverted. Is there any point to this hatnote? Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley _talk _contrib 18:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Take general discussion to Wikipedia talk:Hatnotes#Disambiguating article names that are not ambiguous.

I've given the reverter over a week to explain their actions. Changing back.

Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley _talk _contrib 00:21, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Committee Members

I think the names of the committee members are irrelevant to the reader as none of them are well-known. There seems to be a trend to add them to organisation articles. Maybe we should have a policy on this. Any opinions?

Also, I prefer definition lists to tables for this sort of thing. (However, table might look nicer and it would be hard to make a def. list look like a table.) WP is relatively HTML non-compliant, anyway, unfortunately. Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley _talk _contrib 18:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 00:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Young Greens (Green Party of England and Wales) → Young Greens (England and Wales) … Rationale: Occam's Razor; current title is redundant as no other organisation in England and Wales has young greens in its name; for international purposes, the article's subject is known by the proposed title, never the existing one.

Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley _talk _contrib 15:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Support entirely agree. Warofdreams talk 16:36, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Young Greens of England and Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060830172942/http://www.nusonline.co.uk:80/ to http://www.nusonline.co.uk

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Green Student Network

https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/geography/staff/jenny_pickerill/publications has some info on this network. She interviewed self-identifying members in 1999 so it was in existence then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.249.23.158 (talk) 13:58, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]