The Last Judgment (Michelangelo)

Coordinates: 41°54′10″N 12°27′15″E / 41.90278°N 12.45417°E / 41.90278; 12.45417
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cydebot (talk | contribs) at 22:04, 2 April 2012 (Robot - Speedily moving category Michelangelo paintings to Category:Paintings by Michelangelo per CFDS.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

41°54′10″N 12°27′15″E / 41.90278°N 12.45417°E / 41.90278; 12.45417

The Last Judgment
Italian: Il Giudizio Universale, French: Le Jugement Dernier
ArtistMichelangelo
Year1537-1541
TypeFresco
LocationSistine Chapel, Vatican City
St Bartholomew displaying his flayed skin (considered by many art historians as a self-portrait by Michelangelo) in The Last Judgment.

The Last Judgment is a canonical fresco by the Italian Renaissance master Michelangelo executed on the altar wall of the Sistine Chapel in Vatican City. The work took four years to complete and was done between 1536 and 1541 (preparation of the altar wall began in 1535.) Michelangelo began working on it some twenty years after having finished the Sistine Chapel ceiling.

The work is massive and spans the entire wall behind the altar of the Sistine Chapel. It is a depiction of the Second Coming of Christ and the final and eternal judgment by God of all humanity. The souls of humans rise and descend to their fates, as judged by Christ surrounded by prominent saints including Saints Catherine of Alexandria, Peter, Lawrence, Bartholomew, Paul, Peter Simon, Sebastian, John the Baptist, and others.

The Last Judgment was an object of a heavy dispute between critics within the Catholic counter-reformation and those who understood the genius of the artist and the mannerist style of the painting. Michelangelo was accused of being insensitive to proper decorum, and of flaunting personal style over appropriate depictions of content. The Council of Trent issued decrees that such representations in sacred art were not allowed, and all objectionable art was to be changed or destroyed. In response to certain accusers, when the Pope's own Master of Ceremonies Biagio da Cesena said of the painting "it was mostly disgraceful that in so sacred a place there should have been depicted all those nude figures, exposing themselves so shamefully," and that it was no work for a papal chapel but rather "for the public baths and taverns," Michelangelo worked Cesena's face into the scene as Minos, judge of the underworld (far bottom-right corner of the painting) with Donkey ears (i.e. indicating foolishness), while his nudity is covered by a coiled snake. It is said that when Cesena complained to the Pope, the pontiff joked that his jurisdiction did not extend to hell, so the portrait would have to remain.[1]

The genitalia in the fresco, referred to as 'objections,' were covered after Michelangelo died (1564) by the mannerist artist Daniele da Volterra, when the Council of Trent condemned nudity in religious art . The Council's decree in part reads: "Every superstition shall be removed ... all lasciviousness be avoided; in such wise that figures shall not be painted or adorned with a beauty exciting to lust... there be nothing seen that is disorderly, or that is unbecomingly or confusedly arranged, nothing that is profane, nothing indecorous, seeing that holiness becometh the house of God. And that these things may be the more faithfully observed, the holy Synod ordains, that no one be allowed to place, or cause to be placed, any unusual image, in any place, or church, howsoever exempted, except that image have been approved of by the bishop."

Some have hypothesized that Michelangelo depicted himself in the flayed skin of St. Bartholomew based on feelings of contempt Michelangelo may have had for being commissioned to paint "The Last Judgment." While his idea gained popular support, the greater art historical community has consistently refuted this theory. Michelangelo often drew himself in a way where he had lost all his power and might. He questioned over thoughts of dying and the Day of Judgement, which is seen as a reference to this work. Michelangelo was in his late sixties when he finished this painting, and it has been argued that the peeling of Bartholomew signifies the peeling of the flesh awaiting a new rebirth. [2] The figure of St. Bartholomew was also theorized to depict the satirist and erotic writer Pietro Aretino, who had tried to extort a valuable drawing from Michelangelo; this theory has largely been refuted because the conflict between Michelangelo and Aretino did not occur until 1545, seven years after the fresco's completion.[3]

Restoration

The fresco was restored along with the Sistine vault between 1980 and 1994 under the supervision of curator of the Vatican Museums Frabrizio Mancinelli. The illustration reflects the restoration. During the course of the restoration about half of the censorship of the "Fig-Leaf Campaign" was removed. Numerous pieces of buried details, caught under the smoke and grime of scores of years were revealed after the restoration. It was discovered that the fresco of Biagio de Cesena as Minos with donkey ears was being bitten in the genitalia by a coiled snake. Another discovery is of the figure condemned to Hell directly below and to the right of St. Bartholomew with flayed skin. It was, for centuries, considered to be male until removal of the "fig leaf" proved that it was female.

Solar Symbolism

Apart from its technical mastery, the painting is noted for its radical departures from traditional depictions of the Last Judgment. In particular, firstly, the overall structure seems to swirl around Christ at the center, replacing the traditional pattern of horizontal layers depicting heaven, earth and hell; and secondly, the figure of Christ himself, beardless and muscular, surrounded by light, which has often been compared to the Greek sun-god Apollo. One week before commissioning the work, Pope Clement VII is known to have been studying the new heliocentric cosmology of Copernicus. There seems a real possibility that the painting is in part as an allegory of the new cosmology, with Christ as the sun in the centre of the universe.[4]

References

  1. ^ Reported by Lodovico Domenichi in Historia di detti et fatti notabili di diversi Principi & huommi privati moderni (1556), p. 668
  2. ^ Dixon, John W. Jr. "The Terror of Salvation: The Last Judgment". Retrieved 2007-08-01.
  3. ^ Steinberg, Leo (1980). "The Line of Fate in Michelangelo's Painting". Critical Inquiry. 6 (3): 411–454. doi:10.1086/448058.
  4. ^ Shrimplin, V. (2000). "Michelangelo and Copernicus: A Note on the Sistine Last Judgement ". Journal for the History of Astronomy. 31: 156. Bibcode:2000JHA....31..156STemplate:Inconsistent citations{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link). See also Shrimplin, V. (1999). "Sun Symbolism and Cosmology in Michelangelo's Last Judgement" (Document). Kirksville: Truman State University PressTemplate:Inconsistent citations{{cite document}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link).

External links

Media related to Sistine Chapel - Michelangelo's Last Judgment (restored) at Wikimedia Commons Media related to Sistine Chapel - Michelangelo's Last Judgment (unrestored) at Wikimedia Commons